What would happen to the city's nighttime skyline if energy conservationists owned skyscrapers?
Search
About
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 24, 2007 12:33 PM.
The previous post in this blog was House of Leaves.
The next post in this blog is Art.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35
Movable Type 3.35
Comments (5)
same lights but more energy-efficient. go buffs!!
Posted by dave | January 24, 2007 5:51 PM
Posted on January 24, 2007 17:51
why would they leave lights on when no one is using them?
Posted by nicole | January 25, 2007 12:17 PM
Posted on January 25, 2007 12:17
that's like asking why the stars still shine when it's daytime. go buffs!!
Posted by dave | January 25, 2007 3:30 PM
Posted on January 25, 2007 15:30
way to miss the point you American Pig. go football!!
PS I still love you, Dave.
Posted by nicole | January 26, 2007 8:02 PM
Posted on January 26, 2007 20:02
Nicole I believe your an American also.
Yeah it doesn't make sense that offices are always all lit up a night, but some parts do. They cleaning crews come through the office late at night, working with foreign companies keeps people working odd hours. Sometimes just big deadlines, but I think it is safe to say that there should only be 15% of the lights on that are. I wonder from an energy perspective what that actual cost is, if it is a savings worth even looking for or no one bothers because in the scheme of things it is only like .5%. Anyways fun little question.
Posted by Dan | January 27, 2007 11:41 AM
Posted on January 27, 2007 11:41